↓ Skip to main content

Mind wandering and education: from the classroom to online learning

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
14 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
435 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mind wandering and education: from the classroom to online learning
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00495
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karl K. Szpunar, Samuel T. Moulton, Daniel L. Schacter

Abstract

In recent years, cognitive and educational psychologists have become interested in applying principles of cognitive psychology to education. Here, we discuss the importance of understanding the nature and occurrence of mind wandering in the context of classroom and online lectures. In reviewing the relevant literature, we begin by considering early studies that provide important clues about student attentiveness via dependent measures such as physical markers of inattention, note taking, and retention. We then provide a broad overview of studies that have directly measured mind wandering in the classroom and online learning environments. Finally, we conclude by discussing interventions that might be effective at curbing the occurrence of mind wandering in educational settings, and consider various avenues of future research that we believe can shed light on this well-known but little studied phenomenon.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 435 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 425 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 72 17%
Student > Master 50 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 11%
Researcher 34 8%
Lecturer 27 6%
Other 69 16%
Unknown 135 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 116 27%
Social Sciences 39 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 6%
Computer Science 18 4%
Neuroscience 12 3%
Other 87 20%
Unknown 138 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,653,337
of 24,943,708 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,386
of 33,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,126
of 292,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#164
of 969 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,943,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 969 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.