↓ Skip to main content

Toward a unified model of face and object recognition in the human visual system

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toward a unified model of face and object recognition in the human visual system
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00497
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guy Wallis

Abstract

Our understanding of the mechanisms and neural substrates underlying visual recognition has made considerable progress over the past 30 years. During this period, accumulating evidence has led many scientists to conclude that objects and faces are recognised in fundamentally distinct ways, and in fundamentally distinct cortical areas. In the psychological literature, in particular, this dissociation has led to a palpable disconnect between theories of how we process and represent the two classes of object. This paper follows a trend in part of the recognition literature to try to reconcile what we know about these two forms of recognition by considering the effects of learning. Taking a widely accepted, self-organizing model of object recognition, this paper explains how such a system is affected by repeated exposure to specific stimulus classes. In so doing, it explains how many aspects of recognition generally regarded as unusual to faces (holistic processing, configural processing, sensitivity to inversion, the other-race effect, the prototype effect, etc.) are emergent properties of category-specific learning within such a system. Overall, the paper describes how a single model of recognition learning can and does produce the seemingly very different types of representation associated with faces and objects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 3%
United States 4 3%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 137 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 23%
Student > Bachelor 24 16%
Student > Master 23 15%
Researcher 17 11%
Professor 7 5%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 71 47%
Neuroscience 17 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 11%
Computer Science 11 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 17 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,739,688
of 24,943,708 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,410
of 33,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,248
of 292,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#252
of 969 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,943,708 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 969 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.