↓ Skip to main content

The psychological functions of music listening

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
32 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
125 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
7 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
822 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The psychological functions of music listening
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00511
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Schäfer, Peter Sedlmeier, Christine Städtler, David Huron

Abstract

Why do people listen to music? Over the past several decades, scholars have proposed numerous functions that listening to music might fulfill. However, different theoretical approaches, different methods, and different samples have left a heterogeneous picture regarding the number and nature of musical functions. Moreover, there remains no agreement about the underlying dimensions of these functions. Part one of the paper reviews the research contributions that have explicitly referred to musical functions. It is concluded that a comprehensive investigation addressing the basic dimensions underlying the plethora of functions of music listening is warranted. Part two of the paper presents an empirical investigation of hundreds of functions that could be extracted from the reviewed contributions. These functions were distilled to 129 non-redundant functions that were then rated by 834 respondents. Principal component analysis suggested three distinct underlying dimensions: People listen to music to regulate arousal and mood, to achieve self-awareness, and as an expression of social relatedness. The first and second dimensions were judged to be much more important than the third-a result that contrasts with the idea that music has evolved primarily as a means for social cohesion and communication. The implications of these results are discussed in light of theories on the origin and the functionality of music listening and also for the application of musical stimuli in all areas of psychology and for research in music cognition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 125 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 822 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 802 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 167 20%
Student > Master 102 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 11%
Researcher 54 7%
Student > Postgraduate 36 4%
Other 142 17%
Unknown 231 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 212 26%
Arts and Humanities 65 8%
Social Sciences 58 7%
Computer Science 48 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 4%
Other 162 20%
Unknown 245 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 359. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#90,664
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#170
of 34,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#482
of 290,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#11
of 967 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 967 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.