You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The inevitable contrast: Conscious vs. unconscious processes in action control
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00590 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ezequiel Morsella, T. Andrew Poehlman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 16% |
| Italy | 2 | 11% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Mauritius | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 79% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 23% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 44 | 54% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#898,995
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,896
of 34,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,108
of 293,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#87
of 969 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 969 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.