↓ Skip to main content

The virtual brain: 30 years of video-game play and cognitive abilities

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
63 news outlets
twitter
14 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The virtual brain: 30 years of video-game play and cognitive abilities
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00629
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew J. Latham, Lucy L. M. Patston, Lynette J. Tippett

Abstract

Forty years have passed since video-games were first made widely available to the public and subsequently playing games has become a favorite past-time for many. Players continuously engage with dynamic visual displays with success contingent on the time-pressured deployment, and flexible allocation, of attention as well as precise bimanual movements. Evidence to date suggests that both brief and extensive exposure to video-game play can result in a broad range of enhancements to various cognitive faculties that generalize beyond the original context. Despite promise, video-game research is host to a number of methodological issues that require addressing before progress can be made in this area. Here an effort is made to consolidate the past 30 years of literature examining the effects of video-game play on cognitive faculties and, more recently, neural systems. Future work is required to identify the mechanism that allows the act of video-game play to generate such a broad range of generalized enhancements.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 6 2%
United States 4 2%
Germany 3 1%
Japan 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 225 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 17%
Researcher 36 14%
Student > Master 35 14%
Student > Bachelor 34 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 4%
Other 42 17%
Unknown 49 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 73 29%
Computer Science 21 8%
Neuroscience 19 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 6%
Social Sciences 14 6%
Other 47 19%
Unknown 60 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 510. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
#48,093
of 24,844,992 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#76
of 33,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234
of 292,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#4
of 969 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,844,992 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 969 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.