↓ Skip to main content

Bodily pleasure matters: velocity of touch modulates body ownership during the rubber hand illusion

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 X users
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bodily pleasure matters: velocity of touch modulates body ownership during the rubber hand illusion
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00703
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Crucianelli, Nicola K. Metcalf, Aikaterini Fotopoulou, Paul M. Jenkinson

Abstract

The sense of body ownership represents a fundamental aspect of our self-consciousness. Influential experimental paradigms, such as the rubber hand illusion (RHI), in which a seen rubber hand is experienced as part of one's body when one's own unseen hand receives congruent tactile stimulation, have extensively examined the role of exteroceptive, multisensory integration on body ownership. However, remarkably, despite the more general current interest in the nature and role of interoception in emotion and consciousness, no study has investigated how the illusion may be affected by interoceptive bodily signals, such as affective touch. Here, we recruited 52 healthy, adult participants and we investigated for the first time, whether applying slow velocity, light tactile stimuli, known to elicit interoceptive feelings of pleasantness, would influence the illusion more than faster, emotionally-neutral, tactile stimuli. We also examined whether seeing another person's hand vs. a rubber hand would reduce the illusion in slow vs. fast stroking conditions, as interoceptive signals are used to represent one's own body from within and it is unclear how they would be integrated with visual signals from another person's hand. We found that slow velocity touch was perceived as more pleasant and it produced higher levels of subjective embodiment during the RHI compared with fast touch. Moreover, this effect applied irrespective of whether the seen hand was a rubber or a confederate's hand. These findings provide support for the idea that affective touch, and more generally interoception, may have a unique contribution to the sense of body ownership, and by implication to our embodied psychological "self."

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 204 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 22%
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Master 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 49 23%
Unknown 25 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 90 42%
Neuroscience 26 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 7%
Engineering 11 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 40 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2020.
All research outputs
#610,800
of 24,889,544 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,245
of 33,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,524
of 292,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#67
of 969 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,889,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 969 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.