↓ Skip to main content

Synesthesia: a colorful word with a touching sound?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synesthesia: a colorful word with a touching sound?
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00763
Pubmed ID
Authors

Myrto I. Mylopoulos, Tony Ro

Abstract

Synesthesia is a fairly common condition in which individuals experience atypical responses (such as color experiences) in association with certain types of stimuli (such as non-colored letters). Although synesthesia has been described for centuries, only very recently has there been an explosive growth of systematic scientific examinations of this condition. In this article, we review and critically evaluate current methods for both assessing synesthesia and examining its psychological basis, including the "test-retest" procedure, online battery assessments, and behavioral experiments. We highlight the limitations of these methods for understanding the nature of this complex condition and propose potential solutions to address some of these limitations. We also provide a set of markers that aid in distinguishing synesthesia from other closely related psychological phenomena.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Croatia 1 1%
Serbia 1 1%
Unknown 69 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 21%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 15 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 28%
Neuroscience 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Arts and Humanities 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,846,116
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,785
of 34,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,473
of 291,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#172
of 967 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 967 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.