↓ Skip to main content

The era of the wandering mind? Twenty-first century research on self-generated mental activity

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
33 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The era of the wandering mind? Twenty-first century research on self-generated mental activity
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00891
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felicity Callard, Jonathan Smallwood, Johannes Golchert, Daniel S. Margulies

Abstract

The first decade of the twenty-first century was characterized by renewed scientific interest in self-generated mental activity (activity largely generated by the individual, rather than in direct response to experimenters' instructions or specific external sensory inputs). To understand this renewal of interest, we interrogated the peer-reviewed literature from 2003 to 2012 (i) to explore recent changes in use of terms for self-generated mental activity; (ii) to investigate changes in the topics on which mind wandering research, specifically, focuses; and (iii) to visualize co-citation communities amongst researchers working on self-generated mental activity. Our analyses demonstrated that there has been a dramatic increase in the term "mind wandering" from 2006, and a significant crossing-over of psychological investigations of mind wandering into cognitive neuroscience (particularly in relation to research on the default mode and default mode network). If our article concludes that this might, indeed, be the "era of the wandering mind," it also calls for more explicit reflection to be given by researchers in this field to the terms they use, the topics and brain regions they focus on, and the research literatures that they implicitly foreground or ignore.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Germany 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 186 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 21%
Researcher 30 15%
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 35 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 85 43%
Neuroscience 26 13%
Philosophy 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 42 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2017.
All research outputs
#1,021,675
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,154
of 34,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,054
of 291,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#92
of 967 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 967 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.