↓ Skip to main content

Computationally modeling interpersonal trust

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computationally modeling interpersonal trust
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00893
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Joo Lee, W. Bradley Knox, Jolie B. Wormwood, Cynthia Breazeal, David DeSteno

Abstract

We present a computational model capable of predicting-above human accuracy-the degree of trust a person has toward their novel partner by observing the trust-related nonverbal cues expressed in their social interaction. We summarize our prior work, in which we identify nonverbal cues that signal untrustworthy behavior and also demonstrate the human mind's readiness to interpret those cues to assess the trustworthiness of a social robot. We demonstrate that domain knowledge gained from our prior work using human-subjects experiments, when incorporated into the feature engineering process, permits a computational model to outperform both human predictions and a baseline model built in naiveté of this domain knowledge. We then present the construction of hidden Markov models to investigate temporal relationships among the trust-related nonverbal cues. By interpreting the resulting learned structure, we observe that models built to emulate different levels of trust exhibit different sequences of nonverbal cues. From this observation, we derived sequence-based temporal features that further improve the accuracy of our computational model. Our multi-step research process presented in this paper combines the strength of experimental manipulation and machine learning to not only design a computational trust model but also to further our understanding of the dynamics of interpersonal trust.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 168 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 29%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Researcher 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 35 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 45 26%
Psychology 28 16%
Engineering 26 15%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Unspecified 6 3%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 40 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2016.
All research outputs
#2,441,896
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,793
of 31,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,381
of 283,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#241
of 969 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 969 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.