↓ Skip to main content

Tracking the allocation of attention using human pupillary oscillations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tracking the allocation of attention using human pupillary oscillations
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00919
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marnix Naber, George A. Alvarez, Ken Nakayama

Abstract

The muscles that control the pupil are richly innervated by the autonomic nervous system. While there are central pathways that drive pupil dilations in relation to arousal, there is no anatomical evidence that cortical centers involved with visual selective attention innervate the pupil. In this study, we show that such connections must exist. Specifically, we demonstrate a novel Pupil Frequency Tagging (PFT) method, where oscillatory changes in stimulus brightness over time are mirrored by pupil constrictions and dilations. We find that the luminance-induced pupil oscillations are enhanced when covert attention is directed to the flicker stimulus and when targets are correctly detected in an attentional tracking task. These results suggest that the amplitudes of pupil responses closely follow the allocation of focal visual attention and the encoding of stimuli. PFT provides a new opportunity to study top-down visual attention itself as well as identifying the pathways and mechanisms that support this unexpected phenomenon.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
France 4 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 192 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 21%
Researcher 40 19%
Student > Master 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 31 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 71 34%
Neuroscience 33 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 9%
Computer Science 11 5%
Engineering 8 4%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 42 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,626,022
of 23,420,064 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,713
of 31,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,141
of 284,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#417
of 969 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,420,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,166 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 969 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.