You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nudge politics: efficacy and ethics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00972 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nichola J Raihani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 35% |
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 70% |
| Scientists | 4 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 30 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 15 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 22% |
| Unknown | 27 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,567,325
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,257
of 34,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,568
of 290,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#152
of 967 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 967 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.