↓ Skip to main content

Intensive exposure to narrative in story books as a possibly effective treatment of social perspective-taking in schoolchildren with autism

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intensive exposure to narrative in story books as a possibly effective treatment of social perspective-taking in schoolchildren with autism
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kohei Tsunemi, Ayana Tamura, Shino Ogawa, Tomoko Isomura, Hiroyasu Ito, Misako Ida, Nobuo Masataka

Abstract

One of the major characteristics of autism is impairment of communication and socialization. While such impairment per se has been well documented, research into effective interventions for children with this developmental disorder is still limited. Here we present preliminary evidence for the possibility of improvement of the capability of social perspective-taking in schoolchildren with autism by having intensive experience with narrative, in which they were exposed to narrative in story books read by their parents over a consecutive 5- to 6-day-period. When their capability was evaluated on the basis of a conventional role-taking task, the mean score tended to increase after the exposure as compared to before the exposure, whereas such a change was not recorded in children who did not experience such exposure. These effects were confirmed when the children were retested 4 months later. Although preliminary, the current study represents a step toward the development of more effective social perspective-taking interventions for children with autism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 21%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 43%
Social Sciences 11 14%
Linguistics 5 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2014.
All research outputs
#2,024,360
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#4,120
of 34,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,262
of 325,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#35
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.