You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
I PLAY AT WORK—ten principles for transforming work processes through gamification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00014 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Florin Oprescu, Christian Jones, Mary Katsikitis |
| Abstract |
Gamified workplaces could be a positive and innovative solution to addressing contemporary problems in organizations. Such problems include high levels of stress, reduced sense of community, reduced loyalty and rapid changes in the workforce. To better prepare organizations for the future it may be helpful to identify and understand the potential advantages, disadvantages and areas for future research in relationship to the use of gamification for personal and organizational wellbeing. An analysis of research literature across disciplines in combination with expert opinion identified gamified workplaces as a promising strategy for promoting wellbeing. Furthermore, this paper proposes a set of 10 principles (I PLAY AT WORK) that may support gamification efforts. In addition to the value of mapping the present for the benefit of the future, there is also considerable value in reshaping core ideas related to the workplaces. Gamified workplaces can provide opportunities for a more vigorous and strategic inter-disciplinary research agenda that can stimulate investments in the area. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 492 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Turkey | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Lithuania | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 466 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 126 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 9% |
| Researcher | 34 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 99 | 20% |
| Unknown | 88 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 82 | 17% |
| Computer Science | 76 | 15% |
| Psychology | 56 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 55 | 11% |
| Engineering | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 85 | 17% |
| Unknown | 109 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,330,922
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,756
of 34,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,343
of 320,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#25
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.