You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Smelly primes – when olfactory primes do or do not work
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00096 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M A M Smeets, G B Dijksterhuis |
| Abstract |
In applied olfactory cognition the effects that olfactory stimulation can have on (human) behavior are investigated. To enable an efficient application of olfactory stimuli a model of how they may lead to a change in behavior is proposed. To this end we use the concept of olfactory priming. Olfactory priming may prompt a special view on priming as the olfactory sense has some unique properties which make odors special types of primes. Examples of such properties are the ability of odors to influence our behavior outside of awareness, to lead to strong affective evaluations, to evoke specific memories, and to associate easily and quickly to other environmental stimuli. Opportunities and limitations for using odors as primes are related to these properties, and alternative explanations for reported findings are offered. Implications for olfactory semantic, construal, behavior and goal priming are given based on a brief overview of the priming literature from social psychology and from olfactory perception science. We end by formulating recommendations and ideas for a future research agenda and applications for olfactory priming. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| Norway | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 13% |
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 19% |
| Unknown | 19 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 51 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 21% |
| Unknown | 25 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2017.
All research outputs
#14,189,417
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#15,032
of 29,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,627
of 305,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#127
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.