You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Global timing: a conceptual framework to investigate the neural basis of rhythm perception in humans and non-human species
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00159 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eveline Geiser, Kerry M. M. Walker, Daniel Bendor |
Abstract |
Timing cues are an essential feature of music. To understand how the brain gives rise to our experience of music we must appreciate how acoustical temporal patterns are integrated over the range of several seconds in order to extract global timing. In music perception, global timing comprises three distinct but often interacting percepts: temporal grouping, beat, and tempo. What directions may we take to further elucidate where and how the global timing of music is processed in the brain? The present perspective addresses this question and describes our current understanding of the neural basis of global timing perception. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
United States | 2 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 105 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 21% |
Researcher | 22 | 20% |
Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
Other | 21 | 19% |
Unknown | 12 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 31 | 28% |
Neuroscience | 27 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 18 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2014.
All research outputs
#14,776,077
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#16,033
of 29,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,051
of 305,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#131
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.