↓ Skip to main content

Global timing: a conceptual framework to investigate the neural basis of rhythm perception in humans and non-human species

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global timing: a conceptual framework to investigate the neural basis of rhythm perception in humans and non-human species
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eveline Geiser, Kerry M. M. Walker, Daniel Bendor

Abstract

Timing cues are an essential feature of music. To understand how the brain gives rise to our experience of music we must appreciate how acoustical temporal patterns are integrated over the range of several seconds in order to extract global timing. In music perception, global timing comprises three distinct but often interacting percepts: temporal grouping, beat, and tempo. What directions may we take to further elucidate where and how the global timing of music is processed in the brain? The present perspective addresses this question and describes our current understanding of the neural basis of global timing perception.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 105 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 21%
Researcher 22 20%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 28%
Neuroscience 27 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 18 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2014.
All research outputs
#14,776,077
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#16,033
of 29,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,051
of 305,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#131
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.