You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Irrelevant stimulus processing in ADHD: catecholamine dynamics and attentional networks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00183 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francisco Aboitiz, Tomás Ossandón, Francisco Zamorano, Bárbara Palma, Ximena Carrasco |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 199 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 15% |
| Researcher | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 18% |
| Unknown | 38 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 51 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 44 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 52 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2018.
All research outputs
#4,792,785
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#8,021
of 34,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,982
of 242,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#81
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.