↓ Skip to main content

Postdiction: its implications on visual awareness, hindsight, and sense of agency

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
27 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Postdiction: its implications on visual awareness, hindsight, and sense of agency
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00196
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shinsuke Shimojo

Abstract

There are a few postdictive perceptual phenomena known, in which a stimulus presented later seems causally to affect the percept of another stimulus presented earlier. While backward masking provides a classical example, the flash lag effect stimulates theorists with a variety of intriguing findings. The TMS-triggered scotoma together with "backward filling-in" of it offer a unique neuroscientific case. Findings suggest that various visual attributes are reorganized in a postdictive fashion to be consistent with each other, or to be consistent in a causality framework. In terms of the underlying mechanisms, four prototypical models have been considered: the "catch up," the "reentry," the "different pathway" and the "memory revision" models. By extending the list of postdictive phenomena to memory, sensory-motor and higher-level cognition, one may note that such a postdictive reconstruction may be a general principle of neural computation, ranging from milliseconds to months in a time scale, from local neuronal interactions to long-range connectivity, in the complex brain. The operational definition of the "postdictive phenomenon" can be applicable to such a wide range of sensory/cognitive effects across a wide range of time scale, even though the underlying neural mechanisms may vary across them. This has significant implications in interpreting "free will" and "sense of agency" in functional, psychophysical and neuroscientific terms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 2%
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 196 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 21%
Researcher 37 18%
Student > Master 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 45 22%
Unknown 24 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 78 38%
Neuroscience 34 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 8%
Computer Science 10 5%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 36 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,338,988
of 24,950,117 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,765
of 33,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,823
of 318,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#25
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,950,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.