↓ Skip to main content

Scene analysis in the natural environment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scene analysis in the natural environment
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00199
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael S. Lewicki, Bruno A. Olshausen, Annemarie Surlykke, Cynthia F. Moss

Abstract

The problem of scene analysis has been studied in a number of different fields over the past decades. These studies have led to important insights into problems of scene analysis, but not all of these insights are widely appreciated, and there remain critical shortcomings in current approaches that hinder further progress. Here we take the view that scene analysis is a universal problem solved by all animals, and that we can gain new insight by studying the problems that animals face in complex natural environments. In particular, the jumping spider, songbird, echolocating bat, and electric fish, all exhibit behaviors that require robust solutions to scene analysis problems encountered in the natural environment. By examining the behaviors of these seemingly disparate animals, we emerge with a framework for studying scene analysis comprising four essential properties: (1) the ability to solve ill-posed problems, (2) the ability to integrate and store information across time and modality, (3) efficient recovery and representation of 3D scene structure, and (4) the use of optimal motor actions for acquiring information to progress toward behavioral goals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 5%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 157 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 27%
Researcher 40 24%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Master 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 15 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 25%
Neuroscience 36 22%
Psychology 26 16%
Computer Science 17 10%
Engineering 14 8%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 19 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,270,846
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,077
of 29,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,173
of 226,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#100
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.