↓ Skip to main content

Food-cue affected motor response inhibition and self-reported dieting success: a pictorial affective shifting task

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Food-cue affected motor response inhibition and self-reported dieting success: a pictorial affective shifting task
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00216
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian Meule, Annika P. C. Lutz, Vera Krawietz, Judith Stützer, Claus Vögele, Andrea Kübler

Abstract

Behavioral inhibition is one of the basic facets of executive functioning and is closely related to self-regulation. Impulsive reactions, that is, low inhibitory control, have been associated with higher body mass index (BMI), binge eating, and other problem behaviors (e.g., substance abuse, pathological gambling, etc.). Nevertheless, studies which investigated the direct influence of food-cues on behavioral inhibition have been fairly inconsistent. In the current studies, we investigated food-cue affected behavioral inhibition in young women. For this purpose, we used a go/no-go task with pictorial food and neutral stimuli in which stimulus-response mapping is reversed after every other block (affective shifting task). In study 1, hungry participants showed faster reaction times to and omitted fewer food than neutral targets. Low dieting success and higher BMI were associated with behavioral disinhibition in food relative to neutral blocks. In study 2, both hungry and satiated individuals were investigated. Satiation did not influence overall task performance, but modulated associations of task performance with dieting success and self-reported impulsivity. When satiated, increased food craving during the task was associated with low dieting success, possibly indicating a preload-disinhibition effect following food intake. Food-cues elicited automatic action and approach tendencies regardless of dieting success, self-reported impulsivity, or current hunger levels. Yet, associations between dieting success, impulsivity, and behavioral food-cue responses were modulated by hunger and satiation. Future research investigating clinical samples and including other salient non-food stimuli as control category is warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 147 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 24%
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 67 45%
Neuroscience 13 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 34 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2014.
All research outputs
#1,202,826
of 23,864,690 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,467
of 31,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,342
of 223,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#23
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,864,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,586 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.