↓ Skip to main content

Retraction: Recursive fury: conspiracist ideation in the blogosphere in response to research on conspiracist ideation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
twitter
43 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retraction: Recursive fury: conspiracist ideation in the blogosphere in response to research on conspiracist ideation
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00293
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frontiers in Psychology Editorial Office

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Unknown 36 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 25%
Researcher 9 23%
Other 5 13%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 23%
Social Sciences 6 15%
Environmental Science 4 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 8%
Computer Science 3 8%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 159. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#262,277
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#557
of 34,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,118
of 238,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#8
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.