You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is there a bilingual advantage in the ANT task? Evidence from children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00398 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eneko Antón, Jon A. Duñabeitia, Adelina Estévez, Juan A. Hernández, Alejandro Castillo, Luis J. Fuentes, Douglas J. Davidson, Manuel Carreiras |
| Abstract |
Bilinguals have been shown to outperform monolinguals in a variety of tasks that do not tap into linguistic processes. The origin of this bilingual advantage has been questioned in recent years. While some authors argue that the reason behind this apparent advantage is bilinguals' enhanced executive functioning, inhibitory skills and/or monitoring abilities, other authors suggest that the locus of these differences between bilinguals and monolinguals may lie in uncontrolled factors or incorrectly matched samples. In the current study we tested a group of 180 bilingual children and a group of 180 carefully matched monolinguals in a child-friendly version of the ANT task. Following recent evidence from similar studies with children, our results showed no bilingual advantage at all, given that the performance of the two groups in the task and the indices associated with the individual attention networks were highly similar and statistically indistinguishable. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 283 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 71 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 16% |
| Researcher | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 12% |
| Unknown | 56 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 124 | 43% |
| Linguistics | 36 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 20 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Unknown | 65 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2016.
All research outputs
#1,866,738
of 22,756,196 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#3,677
of 29,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,071
of 227,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#54
of 323 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,756,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 323 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.