You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Tool use disorders after left brain damage
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00473 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Josselin Baumard, François Osiurak, Mathieu Lesourd, Didier Le Gall |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 61 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 19% |
Researcher | 11 | 17% |
Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Professor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 19% |
Unknown | 12 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 24 | 38% |
Neuroscience | 9 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2016.
All research outputs
#7,491,592
of 22,901,818 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#10,966
of 30,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,712
of 226,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#154
of 346 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,901,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 346 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.