↓ Skip to main content

Moral judgment reloaded: a moral dilemma validation study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Moral judgment reloaded: a moral dilemma validation study
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00607
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia F. Christensen, Albert Flexas, Margareta Calabrese, Nadine K. Gut, Antoni Gomila

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 263 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 17%
Student > Master 42 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 15%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 52 19%
Unknown 50 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 129 48%
Neuroscience 17 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 3%
Philosophy 8 3%
Arts and Humanities 8 3%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 61 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,840,801
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,603
of 34,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,557
of 246,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#89
of 409 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 409 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.