↓ Skip to main content

The architecture of visual narrative comprehension: the interaction of narrative structure and page layout in understanding comics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The architecture of visual narrative comprehension: the interaction of narrative structure and page layout in understanding comics
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00680
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neil Cohn

Abstract

How do people make sense of the sequential images in visual narratives like comics? A growing literature of recent research has suggested that this comprehension involves the interaction of multiple systems: The creation of meaning across sequential images relies on a "narrative grammar" that packages conceptual information into categorical roles organized in hierarchic constituents. These images are encapsulated into panels arranged in the layout of a physical page. Finally, how panels frame information can impact both the narrative structure and page layout. Altogether, these systems operate in parallel to construct the Gestalt whole of comprehension of this visual language found in comics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 2%
Malaysia 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 120 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 24%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 25 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 26 20%
Psychology 23 18%
Computer Science 12 9%
Linguistics 9 7%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 30 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,422,274
of 25,306,238 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,932
of 34,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,740
of 234,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#53
of 396 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,306,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 396 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.