↓ Skip to main content

What pops out in positional priming of pop-out: insights from event-related EEG lateralizations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What pops out in positional priming of pop-out: insights from event-related EEG lateralizations
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00688
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahu Gokce, Thomas Geyer, Kathrin Finke, Hermann J. Müller, Thomas Töllner

Abstract

It is well established that, in visual pop-out search, reaction time (RT) performance is influenced by cross-trial repetitions versus changes of target-defining attributes. One instance of this is referred to as "positional priming of pop-out" (pPoP; Maljkovic and Nakayama, 1996). In positional PoP paradigms, the processing of the current target is examined depending on whether it occurs at the previous target or a previous distractor location, relative to a previously empty location ("neutral" baseline), permitting target facilitation and distractor inhibition to be dissociated. The present study combined RT measures with specific sensory- and motor-driven event-related lateralizations to track the time course of four distinct processing levels as a function of the target's position across consecutive trials. The results showed that, relative to targets at previous target and "neutral" locations, the appearance of a target at a previous distractor location was associated with a delayed build-up of the posterior contralateral negativity wave, indicating that distractor positions are suppressed at early stages of visual processing. By contrast, presentation of a target at a previous target, relative to "neutral" and distractor locations, modulated the elicitation of the subsequent stimulus-locked lateralized readiness potential wave, indicating that post-selective response selection is facilitated if the target occurred at the same position as on the previous trial. Overall, the results of present study provide electrophysiological evidence for the idea that target location priming (RT benefits) does not originate from an enhanced coding of target saliency at repeated (target) locations; instead, they arise (near-) exclusively from processing levels subsequent to focal-attentional target selection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 6%
Hungary 1 3%
Unknown 28 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Master 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 52%
Neuroscience 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2014.
All research outputs
#18,379,655
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#22,046
of 29,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,311
of 227,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#346
of 397 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,681 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 397 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.