You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Well-being in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a pilot experience sampling study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00704 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruben G. L. Real, Thorsten Dickhaus, Albert Ludolph, Martin Hautzinger, Andrea Kübler |
| Abstract |
The aim of this longitudinal study was to identify predictors of instantaneous well-being in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Based on flow theory well-being was expected to be highest when perceived demands and perceived control were in balance, and that thinking about the past would be a risk factor for rumination which would in turn reduce well-being. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 13 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2014.
All research outputs
#20,232,430
of 22,758,248 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#23,966
of 29,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,358
of 225,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#369
of 388 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 388 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.