You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The visible face of intention: why kinematics matters
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00815 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caterina Ansuini, Andrea Cavallo, Cesare Bertone, Cristina Becchio |
| Abstract |
A key component of social understanding is the ability to read intentions from movements. But how do we discern intentions in others' actions? What kind of intention information is actually available in the features of others' movements? Based on the assumption that intentions are hidden away in the other person's mind, standard theories of social cognition have mainly focused on the contribution of higher level processes. Here, we delineate an alternative approach to the problem of intention-from-movement understanding. We argue that intentions become "visible" in the surface flow of agents' motions. Consequently, the ability to understand others' intentions cannot be divorced from the capability to detect essential kinematics. This hypothesis has far reaching implications for how we know other minds and predict others' behavior. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 29% |
| Researcher | 22 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 22% |
| Unknown | 10 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 47 | 40% |
| Neuroscience | 19 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 6% |
| Engineering | 6 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2014.
All research outputs
#6,839,610
of 24,791,202 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,771
of 33,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,228
of 234,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#158
of 374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,791,202 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.