You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mindfulness-Based Functional Therapy: a preliminary open trial of an integrated model of care for people with persistent low back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00839 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Schütze, Helen Slater, Peter O'Sullivan, Jennifer Thornton, Amy Finlay-Jones, Clare S. Rees |
| Abstract |
This pilot study investigated the feasibility and clinical utility of implementing a novel, evidence-informed, interdisciplinary group intervention-Mindfulness Based Functional Therapy (MBFT)-for the management of persistent low back pain (LBP) in primary care. MBFT aimed to improve physical and psychological functioning in patients with persistent LBP. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 31% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Sweden | 2 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 63% |
| Scientists | 9 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 355 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 51 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 11% |
| Researcher | 39 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 33 | 9% |
| Other | 80 | 22% |
| Unknown | 71 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 74 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 64 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 39 | 11% |
| Unknown | 83 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2017.
All research outputs
#1,376,310
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,780
of 30,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,860
of 230,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#55
of 374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.