You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tackling the social cognition paradox through multi-scale approaches
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00882 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guillaume Dumas, J. A. Scott Kelso, Jacqueline Nadel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 20% |
| Finland | 2 | 13% |
| Denmark | 2 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 20% |
| Researcher | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 43 | 40% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 26 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,466,186
of 24,590,593 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#6,474
of 33,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,993
of 236,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#112
of 378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,590,593 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.