You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A spoon full of studies helps the comparison go down: a comparative analysis of Tulving’s spoon test
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00893 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Damian Scarf, Christopher Smith, Michael Stuart |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 45 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 26% |
Student > Master | 9 | 20% |
Researcher | 5 | 11% |
Professor | 3 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 20% |
Unknown | 5 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 20 | 43% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 11% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,432,836
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,438
of 29,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,467
of 231,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#163
of 377 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 377 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.