↓ Skip to main content

Moral hypocrisy in economic games—how prosocial behavior is shaped by social expectations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
15 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Moral hypocrisy in economic games—how prosocial behavior is shaped by social expectations
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00897
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucius Caviola, Nadira Faulmüller

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 66 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 22%
Student > Master 10 15%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 35%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 7%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2020.
All research outputs
#940,538
of 25,168,110 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,969
of 33,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,089
of 237,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#46
of 378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,168,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.