↓ Skip to main content

Effects of monitoring for visual events on distinct components of attention

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of monitoring for visual events on distinct components of attention
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00930
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian H. Poth, Anders Petersen, Claus Bundesen, Werner X. Schneider

Abstract

Monitoring the environment for visual events while performing a concurrent task requires adjustment of visual processing priorities. By use of Bundesen's (1990) Theory of Visual Attention, we investigated how monitoring for an object-based brief event affected distinct components of visual attention in a concurrent task. The perceptual salience of the event was varied. Monitoring reduced the processing speed in the concurrent task, and the reduction was stronger when the event was less salient. The monitoring task neither affected the temporal threshold of conscious perception nor the storage capacity of visual short-term memory nor the efficiency of top-down controlled attentional selection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Master 2 6%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 44%
Neuroscience 4 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2014.
All research outputs
#18,376,056
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#22,033
of 29,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,218
of 235,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#336
of 379 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 379 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.