You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The joint Simon effect: a review and theoretical integration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00974 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Dolk, Bernhard Hommel, Lorenza S. Colzato, Simone Schütz-Bosbach, Wolfgang Prinz, Roman Liepelt |
| Abstract |
The social or joint Simon effect has been developed to investigate how and to what extent people mentally represent their own and other persons' action/task and how these cognitive representations influence an individual's own behavior when interacting with another person. Here, we provide a review of the available evidence and theoretical frameworks. Based on this review, we suggest a comprehensive theory that integrates aspects of earlier approaches-the Referential Coding Account. This account provides an alternative to the social interpretation of the (joint) go-nogo Simon effect (aka the social Simon effect) and is able to integrate seemingly opposite findings on joint action. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 229 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 24% |
| Researcher | 41 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Professor | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 36 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 123 | 51% |
| Neuroscience | 26 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 25 | 10% |
| Unknown | 49 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,879,214
of 25,646,963 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#11,147
of 34,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,086
of 250,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#173
of 375 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,646,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 375 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.