↓ Skip to main content

Nonverbal synchrony of head- and body-movement in psychotherapy: different signals have different associations with outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nonverbal synchrony of head- and body-movement in psychotherapy: different signals have different associations with outcome
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00979
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabian Ramseyer, Wolfgang Tschacher

Abstract

The coordination of patient's and therapist's bodily movement - nonverbal synchrony - has been empirically shown to be associated with psychotherapy outcome. This finding was based on dynamic movement patterns of the whole body. The present paper is a new analysis of an existing dataset (Ramseyer and Tschacher, 2011), which extends previous findings by differentiating movements pertaining to head and upper-body regions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 229 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 17%
Student > Master 35 15%
Researcher 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 47 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 114 48%
Neuroscience 15 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 4%
Computer Science 10 4%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 54 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,779,524
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,711
of 29,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,312
of 238,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#174
of 367 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 367 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.