You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using brain stimulation to disentangle neural correlates of conscious vision
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tom A. de Graaf, Alexander T. Sack |
| Abstract |
Research into the neural correlates of consciousness (NCCs) has blossomed, due to the advent of new and increasingly sophisticated brain research tools. Neuroimaging has uncovered a variety of brain processes that relate to conscious perception, obtained in a range of experimental paradigms. But methods such as functional magnetic resonance imaging or electroencephalography do not always afford inference on the functional role these brain processes play in conscious vision. Such empirical NCCs could reflect neural prerequisites, neural consequences, or neural substrates of a conscious experience. Here, we take a closer look at the use of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques in this context. We discuss and review how NIBS methodology can enlighten our understanding of brain mechanisms underlying conscious vision by disentangling the empirical NCCs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| Guinea | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 30 | 32% |
| Neuroscience | 19 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2014.
All research outputs
#6,274,002
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,082
of 29,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,138
of 251,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#155
of 367 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,681 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 367 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.