↓ Skip to main content

Focused attention, open monitoring and loving kindness meditation: effects on attention, conflict monitoring, and creativity – A review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
30 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
545 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Focused attention, open monitoring and loving kindness meditation: effects on attention, conflict monitoring, and creativity – A review
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01083
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dominique P Lippelt, Bernhard Hommel, Lorenza S Colzato

Abstract

Meditation is becoming increasingly popular as a topic for scientific research and theories on meditation are becoming ever more specific. We distinguish between what is called focused Attention meditation, open Monitoring meditation, and loving kindness (or compassion) meditation. Research suggests that these meditations have differential, dissociable effects on a wide range of cognitive (control) processes, such as attentional selection, conflict monitoring, divergent, and convergent thinking. Although research on exactly how the various meditations operate on these processes is still missing, different kinds of meditations are associated with different neural structures and different patterns of electroencephalographic activity. In this review we discuss recent findings on meditation and suggest how the different meditations may affect cognitive processes, and we give suggestions for directions of future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 545 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
India 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 525 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 93 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 16%
Student > Bachelor 84 15%
Researcher 67 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 6%
Other 82 15%
Unknown 98 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 235 43%
Neuroscience 44 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 6%
Social Sciences 19 3%
Other 75 14%
Unknown 107 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#335,564
of 24,818,814 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#686
of 33,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,208
of 257,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#14
of 367 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,818,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 367 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.