↓ Skip to main content

Communicating risk in prenatal screening: the consequences of Bayesian misapprehension

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Communicating risk in prenatal screening: the consequences of Bayesian misapprehension
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01272
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gorka Navarrete, Rut Correia, Dan Froimovitch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 55%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2015.
All research outputs
#6,784,058
of 24,319,828 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,702
of 32,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,742
of 267,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#173
of 378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,319,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.