↓ Skip to main content

Nonverbal synchrony and affect in dyadic interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
236 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
382 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nonverbal synchrony and affect in dyadic interactions
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, November 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01323
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wolfgang Tschacher, Georg M Rees, Fabian Ramseyer

Abstract

In an experiment on dyadic social interaction, we invited participants to verbal interactions in cooperative, competitive, and 'fun task' conditions. We focused on the link between interactants' affectivity and their nonverbal synchrony, and explored which further variables contributed to affectivity: interactants' personality traits, sex, and the prescribed interaction tasks. Nonverbal synchrony was quantified by the coordination of interactants' body movement, using an automated video-analysis algorithm (motion energy analysis). Traits were assessed with standard questionnaires of personality, attachment, interactional style, psychopathology, and interpersonal reactivity. We included 168 previously unacquainted individuals who were randomly allocated to same-sex dyads (84 females, 84 males, mean age 27.8 years). Dyads discussed four topics of general interest drawn from an urn of eight topics, and finally engaged in a fun interaction. Each interaction lasted 5 min. In between interactions, participants repeatedly assessed their affect. Using hierarchical linear modeling, we found moderate to strong effect sizes for synchrony to occur, especially in competitive and fun task conditions. Positive affect was associated positively with synchrony, negative affect was associated negatively. As for causal direction, data supported the interpretation that synchrony entailed affect rather than vice versa. The link between nonverbal synchrony and affect was strongest in female dyads. The findings extend previous reports of synchrony and mimicry associated with emotion in relationships and suggest a possible mechanism of the synchrony-affect correlation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 382 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 367 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 87 23%
Student > Master 55 14%
Researcher 45 12%
Student > Bachelor 38 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 8%
Other 53 14%
Unknown 72 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 198 52%
Neuroscience 20 5%
Computer Science 19 5%
Social Sciences 16 4%
Arts and Humanities 8 2%
Other 35 9%
Unknown 86 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,825,182
of 24,133,587 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#7,813
of 32,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,064
of 370,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#132
of 356 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,133,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 356 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.