You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Pain frequency moderates the relationship between pain catastrophizing and pain
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01421 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Heidi Kjøgx, Robert Zachariae, Mogens Pfeiffer-Jensen, Helge Kasch, Peter Svensson, Troels S. Jensen, Lene Vase |
Abstract |
Pain frequency has been shown to influence sensitization, psychological distress, and pain modulation. The present study examined if pain frequency moderates the relationship between pain catastrophizing and pain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 3 | 30% |
Canada | 1 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
United States | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 96 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
Researcher | 11 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 17% |
Unknown | 17 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 22% |
Psychology | 15 | 15% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2014.
All research outputs
#6,119,844
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#8,748
of 31,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,083
of 356,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#170
of 365 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 365 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.