You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Visual anticipation biases conscious decision making but not bottom-up visual processing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01443 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zenon Mathews, Ryszard Cetnarski, Paul F. M. J. Verschure |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 66 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 20% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 23 | 32% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 14% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,880,708
of 23,192,960 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#5,485
of 30,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,808
of 354,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#118
of 399 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,192,960 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 399 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.