↓ Skip to main content

Forever Young(er): potential age-defying effects of long-term meditation on gray matter atrophy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 34,615)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Forever Young(er): potential age-defying effects of long-term meditation on gray matter atrophy
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01551
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eileen Luders, Nicolas Cherbuin, Florian Kurth

Abstract

While overall life expectancy has been increasing, the human brain still begins deteriorating after the first two decades of life and continues degrading further with increasing age. Thus, techniques that diminish the negative impact of aging on the brain are desirable. Existing research, although scarce, suggests meditation to be an attractive candidate in the quest for an accessible and inexpensive, efficacious remedy. Here, we examined the link between age and cerebral gray matter re-analyzing a large sample (n = 100) of long-term meditators and control subjects aged between 24 and 77 years. When correlating global and local gray matter with age, we detected negative correlations within both controls and meditators, suggesting a decline over time. However, the slopes of the regression lines were steeper and the correlation coefficients were stronger in controls than in meditators. Moreover, the age-affected brain regions were much more extended in controls than in meditators, with significant group-by-age interactions in numerous clusters throughout the brain. Altogether, these findings seem to suggest less age-related gray matter atrophy in long-term meditation practitioners.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 525 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 192 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 15%
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 14%
Researcher 25 12%
Other 19 9%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 36 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 63 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 11%
Neuroscience 21 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 10%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 41 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 882. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#20,102
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#27
of 34,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152
of 360,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#1
of 394 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 394 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.