↓ Skip to main content

Somatic influences on subjective well-being and affective disorders: the convergence of thermosensory and central serotonergic systems

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
18 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Somatic influences on subjective well-being and affective disorders: the convergence of thermosensory and central serotonergic systems
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01580
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles L. Raison, Matthew W. Hale, Lawrence E. Williams, Tor D. Wager, Christopher A. Lowry

Abstract

Current theories suggest that the brain is the sole source of mental illness. However, affective disorders, and major depressive disorder (MDD) in particular, may be better conceptualized as brain-body disorders that involve peripheral systems as well. This perspective emphasizes the embodied, multifaceted physiology of well-being, and suggests that afferent signals from the body may contribute to cognitive and emotional states. In this review, we focus on evidence from preclinical and clinical studies suggesting that afferent thermosensory signals contribute to well-being and depression. Although thermoregulatory systems have traditionally been conceptualized as serving primarily homeostatic functions, increasing evidence suggests neural pathways responsible for regulating body temperature may be linked more closely with emotional states than previously recognized, an affective warmth hypothesis. Human studies indicate that increasing physical warmth activates brain circuits associated with cognitive and affective functions, promotes interpersonal warmth and prosocial behavior, and has antidepressant effects. Consistent with these effects, preclinical studies in rodents demonstrate that physical warmth activates brain serotonergic neurons implicated in antidepressant-like effects. Together, these studies suggest that (1) thermosensory pathways interact with brain systems that control affective function, (2) these pathways are dysregulated in affective disorders, and (3) activating warm thermosensory pathways promotes a sense of well-being and has therapeutic potential in the treatment of affective disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 150 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 18%
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 27 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 63 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 10%
Neuroscience 16 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 30 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,393,062
of 24,323,543 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,855
of 32,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,434
of 361,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#71
of 401 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,323,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 401 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.