You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Individual differences in attention influence perceptual decision making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00018 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael D. Nunez, Ramesh Srinivasan, Joachim Vandekerckhove |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| India | 1 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Belgium | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 30% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 59 | 49% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,450,670
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#10,886
of 29,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,643
of 352,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#213
of 375 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 375 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.