↓ Skip to main content

Control your mind, make affordance available

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Control your mind, make affordance available
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00096
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zheng Jin, Yang Lee, Jin Zhu

Abstract

Evaluating the affordance-control interpretation of the relationship between performance and object estimation has been proposed by psychophysical and psychonomic studies. This study examined the weight estimation-performance relationship. Individuals with visual impairment or blindness put shots that varied in weight among five scales. In Experiment 1, only the perceived weight was a significant performance constraint. In Experiment 2, the weight was perceived as heavier when the participants' actions were manipulated through cognitive interpretation. The increase in perceived weight appeared to be related to performance and intrinsically scaled to the action, even when the action was only mental rather than physical. The study's findings suggest that bodily experience and action are the basis for physical judgments and likely underlie other basic cognitive interpretations of sensory stimuli. This suggestion goes hand in hand with the biofunctional approaches which assume direct experience of the integrated wholeness of one's body is fundamental for developing other kinds of awareness. Different perspectives from oriental philosophy and psychology are also discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 29%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 6 19%