You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The causal cognition of wrong doing: incest, intentionality, and morality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00136 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rita Astuti, Maurice Bloch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Palestine, State of | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 86% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 59 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 19% |
| Unknown | 4 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 24 | 39% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 24% |
| Philosophy | 9 | 15% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,431,012
of 25,046,311 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#2,950
of 33,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,555
of 260,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#77
of 436 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,046,311 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 436 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.