You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of working memory load on uncertain decision-making: evidence from the Iowa Gambling Task
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00162 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ji-Fang Cui, Ya Wang, Hai-Song Shi, Lu-Lu Liu, Xing-Jie Chen, Ying-He Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 33 | 49% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2015.
All research outputs
#13,350,150
of 22,786,691 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,965
of 29,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,621
of 255,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#270
of 435 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 435 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.