You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What's really wrong with cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00323 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neil Thomas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 25 | 41% |
| Australia | 7 | 11% |
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 51% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 25% |
| Scientists | 13 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 174 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 22% |
| Unknown | 50 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 92 | 52% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 57 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2019.
All research outputs
#866,765
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,812
of 34,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,639
of 278,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#42
of 476 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,726 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 476 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.