Title |
Chronologically organized structure in autobiographical memory search
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00338 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Iva K. Brunec, Martin J. Chadwick, Amir-Homayoun Javadi, Ling Guo, Charlotte P. Malcolm, Hugo J. Spiers |
Abstract |
Each of us has a rich set of autobiographical memories that provides us with a coherent story of our lives. These memories are known to be highly structured both thematically and temporally. However, it is not known how we naturally tend to explore the mental timeline of our memories. Here we developed a novel cued retrieval paradigm in order to investigate the temporal element of memory search. We found that, when asked to search for memories in the days immediately surrounding a salient cued event, participants displayed a marked set of temporal biases in their search patterns. Specifically, participants first tended to jump back in time and retrieve memories from the day prior to the cued event. Following this they then transitioned forward in time, and retrieved memories from the day after the cued event. This pattern of results replicated in a second experiment with a much larger group of participants, and a different method of cueing the memories. We argue that this set of temporal biases is consistent with memory search conforming to a temporally ordered narrative structure. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 19 | 35% |
Canada | 4 | 7% |
Netherlands | 4 | 7% |
United States | 4 | 7% |
France | 2 | 4% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Antarctica | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 33 | 60% |
Scientists | 18 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
United States | 2 | 4% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 46 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 21% |
Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
Researcher | 6 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 21% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 29 | 55% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 12 | 23% |