↓ Skip to main content

Color and psychological functioning: a review of theoretical and empirical work

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
31 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
43 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
796 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Color and psychological functioning: a review of theoretical and empirical work
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00368
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew J Elliot

Abstract

In the past decade there has been increased interest in research on color and psychological functioning. Important advances have been made in theoretical work and empirical work, but there are also important weaknesses in both areas that must be addressed for the literature to continue to develop apace. In this article, I provide brief theoretical and empirical reviews of research in this area, in each instance beginning with a historical background and recent advancements, and proceeding to an evaluation focused on weaknesses that provide guidelines for future research. I conclude by reiterating that the literature on color and psychological functioning is at a nascent stage of development, and by recommending patience and prudence regarding conclusions about theory, findings, and real-world application.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 796 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 787 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 162 20%
Student > Master 111 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 12%
Researcher 51 6%
Student > Postgraduate 23 3%
Other 121 15%
Unknown 236 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 158 20%
Design 57 7%
Engineering 36 5%
Computer Science 34 4%
Arts and Humanities 33 4%
Other 220 28%
Unknown 258 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 294. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#121,269
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#252
of 34,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,237
of 279,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#7
of 464 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 464 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.