↓ Skip to main content

Managing chronic pathologies with a stepped mHealth-based approach in clinical psychology and medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Managing chronic pathologies with a stepped mHealth-based approach in clinical psychology and medicine
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00407
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gianluca Castelnuovo, Italo Zoppis, Eugenio Santoro, Martina Ceccarini, Giada Pietrabissa, Gian Mauro Manzoni, Stefania Corti, Maria Borrello, Emanuele Maria Giusti, Roberto Cattivelli, Anna Melesi, Giancarlo Mauri, Enrico Molinari, Francesco Sicurello

Abstract

Chronic diseases and conditions typically require long-term monitoring and treatment protocols both in traditional settings and in out-patient frameworks. The economic burden of chronic conditions is a key challenge and new and mobile technologies could offer good solutions. mHealth could be considered an evolution of eHealth and could be defined as the practice of medicine and public health supported by mobile communication devices. mHealth approach could overcome limitations linked with the traditional, restricted, and highly expensive in-patient treatment of many chronic pathologies. Possible applications include stepped mHealth approach, where patients can be monitored and treated in their everyday contexts. Unfortunately, many barriers for the spread of mHealth are still present. Due the significant impact of psychosocial factors on disease evolution, psychotherapies have to be included into the chronic disease protocols. Existing psychological theories of health behavior change have to be adapted to the new technological contexts and requirements. In conclusion, clinical psychology and medicine have to face the "chronic care management" challenge in both traditional and mHealth settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 103 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 27 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 12%
Computer Science 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 33 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2015.
All research outputs
#6,241,999
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#8,916
of 31,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,120
of 265,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#183
of 467 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 467 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.